People, learning and performance consulting / Australia

Learning that changes the work.

A course can be well designed, well attended and almost irrelevant to the result. I help HR, L&D and business leaders work backwards from performance: what needs to happen differently, what currently gets in the way and which mix of learning, process, tools and support can change it.

GREG WOULFE / NEWCASTLE, AU

Start here

This may be the problem if…

My point of view

Start with performance, then decide what people need

Learning is useful when it helps somebody do important work better. That sounds obvious, but many projects begin after the solution has already been named: build a course, run a workshop or launch a pathway.

I begin with the outcome and the behaviour. What would we see people doing if the problem improved? What makes that difficult today? Is the gap knowledge, practice, feedback, process, tools, incentives, workload or some combination of them?

Sometimes learning is central. Sometimes the most useful response is a job aid, a manager conversation, a process change or removing a piece of friction. The goal is not to defend a format. It is to improve the work.

How I approach it

From request to useful response

The work stays close to the people doing the job and the evidence the organisation can realistically collect.

01

Define the result

Clarify the business outcome, the observable behaviour and the group or moment where the difference needs to appear.

02

Diagnose the environment

Look at the workflow, tools, expectations, incentives, manager signals and existing capability before deciding on the response.

03

Design for practice

Build the smallest mix of learning, performance support and environmental change that helps people practise and apply the behaviour.

04

Measure the chain

Connect participation to capability, capability to behaviour and behaviour to a meaningful work or business measure.

Useful outputs

What the work can produce

The output depends on the diagnosis. These are common pieces, not a compulsory bundle.

  1. 01

    A performance and behavioural diagnosis grounded in the work

  2. 02

    A learning or capability strategy tied to clear priorities

  3. 03

    Practice-based programs, labs and performance support

  4. 04

    Manager and environmental changes that support transfer

  5. 05

    A practical evaluation plan with measures people can actually use

Why me

Learning is part of my background, not my boundary

I have led and designed learning in operational and global environments, then spent years working more broadly across capability, technology and change. That makes it easier to challenge a training brief without dismissing the real need behind it.

I care about the experience, but I care more about what survives afterwards. The useful question is not whether people liked the intervention. It is whether the work became better.

See the experience behind it

Start with a conversation

Bring me the performance problem.

You do not need a finished learning brief. A stuck outcome, a repeated mistake or a change that is not landing is enough to begin the conversation.

Talk it through